Author |
|
15-Apr-2012 10:36:13 AM
|
On 15/04/2012 Ben_E wrote:
>Wow, Melton Creek does look fairly ordinary.
>
There is an 'okay'* section further along to the left.
*If you are local and car less and desperate...
|
15-Apr-2012 12:36:37 PM
|
Climbed it a couple of times yesterday.. could feel where it may have been chipped.. Where do 'they' think it was chipped? - Have climbed it about 6 months ago.. and seemed pretty much unchanged..
|
15-Apr-2012 8:17:27 PM
|
Mikey's photos:
|
15-Apr-2012 9:59:32 PM
|
Great to get the photos finally showing!
I've visited and climbed at WG at most a couple of times a year for many years and S&G often gets a lead. It's one of the best there, along with Redex, Barbara and Tina, so deserves traffic. Good top rope climb for those wanting to crank harder too.
Mind you I was surprised by the retro a few years ago. Not needed.
I think that's how the hold has been for (dare I say) at least 20 years! If that's the alleged recently 'enhanced' hold it makes no difference to the grade as that one was always a good hold! Looks the same to me, but what would I know. I just pull on it.
Michael
PS Don't try to climb the start when any decent sun is on the face! Slippery as a .......
|
17-Apr-2012 2:56:13 PM
|
On 14/04/2012 Miguel75 wrote:
>EDIT: for some reason I can't get the pics to display. Anyone??
>(snip) I took a few pics;
>
>
>
>I took another pic of a possibly "enhanced" hold, even though my gut says
>it's not, and while it might be hard to see, I like the pic:)
>
>
>
I looked at your public profile 'view pictures' again just now, and note that I can see all those you have uploaded previously, except these two, ... and that these two concerned still have titles that include the # keystroke.
Maybe you need to edit those titles on the uploaded ones, or if you can no longer do that; then delete them and upload again without the # keystroke, as you did in your second attempt and which only worked for a very short time?
|