On 30/01/2012 superstu wrote:
>... The place is already starting to get ripped
>up from climbers walking all over the burnt area, this is not good and
>we need to let the place recover.
Agreed, that's certainly not good if that's what's happening. I'm surprised though, I'd have thought it was easier to approach those areas walking over rock (maybe not since the fire though?). I think if any sort of ban doesn't seem reasonable to climbers then it's more likely to get ignored. Does one particular route just need to me marked perhaps? Or just stay on the rock?