On 21/12/2005 simey wrote:
>it would be good to
>see another heritage-listed route in the lower grades... maybe Cassandra
>(oh that's right, that's been completely altered, despite the fact that
>it was never considered a dangerous route in its original state).
I am not sure this is a very good example of a route being "changed" by being rebolted. OK, I only climbed it once pre rebolt, and once after, but it seemed a very similar climbing experince to me. In fact, my distinct impression was it actually had fewer (but still well located and sufficent) bolts after the re-bolt. |