Chockstone Forum

      Sponsored By
      ROCK
   HARDWARE

Chockstone Photography

Australian Landscape Prints

Chockstone Forum - Chockstone Feedback

Provide Feedback About This Website

Topic Date User

31/12/14 Chockstone spam-hack-attack 22-Jan-2015 At 3:15:24 PM IdratherbeclimbingM9

Message

Hmm, block-lists.

Why is 'con-text' (when written as the normal one word version), considered suspicious input and not allowing the reply to go through?

Wendy experienced it the other day ("the word 'c_rsory' is terribly upsetting to chockstone"), and made half a dozen posts to make a short point, likewise I received a half dozen PMs (original broken up into small portions), from one sender recently trying to isolate a single offending word before his 'PM' would go. ~> Blerrie good thing I had cleaned up my PM box prior, or there wouldn't have been space for those to get to me!

(2nd Post edit: He has since informed me that the offending word was precurs_r.)

Today while trying to send a PM to another, it keeps getting blocked due suspicious input, though my experimentation has not isolated the offending bit...
(Post edit. I found the offender word. It was 'un-characteristic')!

(3rd post edit: Chocky doesn't like tr_ncated either).
(4th edit: Don't use fa ke either!)

Is it possible to work around this inconvenience without publishing the offending words if you think the spam-hackster might read and use that info?