Author |
|
25-Jul-2016 2:56:01 PM
|
The Liberals didn't run a candidate as there was a sitting Nationals member (unlike last election).
|
25-Jul-2016 3:05:07 PM
|
On 25/07/2016 ajfclark wrote:
>The Liberals didn't run a candidate as there was a sitting Nationals member
>(unlike last election).
Right. Not so impressive. I guess that explains why the Nats got 60% of the vote.
|
25-Jul-2016 3:38:59 PM
|
On 25/07/2016 Rawpowa! wrote:
>On 20/07/2016 ajfclark wrote:
>>http://vtr.aec.gov.au/HousePollingPlaceFirstPrefs-20499-4524.htm
>>
>>Compared to the overall result in Mallee, the Natimuk booth had way higher
>>support for The Greens, slightly higher support for RUP and slightly
>higher
>>informal votes. The Nationals and CEC polled about the same as elsewhere
>>in Mallee and Labor polled far lower.
>
>0 votes for the Liberals, that's impressive.
Not when you consider they didn't run a candidate!
|
25-Jul-2016 4:33:54 PM
|
There is a hopefull long term blessing in Paulines votes. Coalition, Labor and Greens will pull there socks up. They suck too.
|