Author |
|
26-Sep-2011 11:30:20 AM
|
On 25/09/2011 egosan wrote:
>The final sequence showing Lee Cossey on the final moves of Sneaky Snake
>is great. Swearing and all, it manages to capture some desperation that
>is so often missing sport climbing film. Nice work.
Its actually Ben on Groove Train as far as I remember. Shows how good the film is when people cant even tell the climbs/climbers apart!
|
26-Sep-2011 11:35:59 AM
|
Are those guys married?
Tension.
|
26-Sep-2011 11:39:20 AM
|
Thats just normal climbing partner tension isn't it?...you should see WWS rant when I grade his newly completed 16 project 15..talk about tantys.
|
26-Sep-2011 11:43:26 AM
|
f--- yeah calling my 2 year french 5a proj. a 4+ isn't cool man. Just cause you think its all jugs......
|
26-Sep-2011 11:52:15 AM
|
On 26/09/2011 rodw wrote:
>Thats just normal climbing partner tension isn't it?
Nope, he was just being arrogant.
|
26-Sep-2011 11:54:06 AM
|
I thought he was just shit stirring?
|
26-Sep-2011 12:01:51 PM
|
On 26/09/2011 Sabu wrote:
>Nope, he was just being arrogant.
It didn't come that way across to me... definitely only shit stirring
|
26-Sep-2011 12:12:53 PM
|
If he was shit stirring he didn't do it very well. Came across completely different to me.
|
26-Sep-2011 12:16:07 PM
|
How can zac be being arrogant about a route that in the scheme of things is essentially "easy". Note above rodw and my arguments about 16s. I've heard 2nd hand of dider rabatou not understanding "is this what you call bushwalking" after doing 2nd coming at araps. Its not arrogant it is fact.
Yours sincerely a vertical bushwalker.
|
26-Sep-2011 12:19:00 PM
|
On 26/09/2011 Sabu wrote:
>If he was shit stirring he didn't do it very well. Came across completely
>different to me.
Lol then your obviously a bit too precious about your grades then me thinks...to see a blatant shit stir when ya see one.
|
26-Sep-2011 12:34:10 PM
|
On 26/09/2011 widewetandslippery wrote:
>f--- yeah calling my 2 year french 5a proj. a 4+ isn't cool man. Just
>cause you think its all jugs......
ahhh... tension.
|
26-Sep-2011 12:49:57 PM
|
That's just Zac. He is the biggest sandbagger going around. He once told me there was an awesome grade 22 handcrack that hadn't been climbed just left of Naja on Taipan. Further inspection proved it was an incipient seam.
|
26-Sep-2011 1:31:02 PM
|
On 26/09/2011 Sabu wrote:
>On 26/09/2011 rodw wrote:
>>Thats just normal climbing partner tension isn't it?
>
>Nope, he was just being arrogant.
Mate, wtf would you know! Have you met Zac? Climbed with him? One of the least arrogant, funniest and nicest dudes you could hope meet at the crag... Plenty of other talented crankers out there with WAY more ego than him.
If you ever actually got out of you armchair and onto the rock you might bump into him one day!
|
26-Sep-2011 2:01:53 PM
|
The Captain of Crotch has spoken!
|
26-Sep-2011 2:24:41 PM
|
On 26/09/2011 phil_nev wrote:
>Mate, wtf would you know! Have you met Zac? Climbed with him? One of the
>least arrogant, funniest and nicest dudes you could hope meet at the crag...
>Plenty of other talented crankers out there with WAY more ego than him.
>
Fair call. But people tend to make judgements based on what they see and that's what I saw in this clip. Of course my judgement could easily change if i met him, or if others say otherwise (as they have), its an opinion afterall, not fact.
>If you ever actually got out of you armchair and onto the rock you might
>bump into him one day!
Now this is much more an assumption than the one I made.
|
26-Sep-2011 2:52:03 PM
|
On 26/09/2011 wallwombat wrote:
>The Captain of Crotch has spoken!
I am not the captain of the captains blog, merely a loyal servant.
|
26-Sep-2011 2:55:44 PM
|
On 26/09/2011 Sabu wrote:
>On 26/09/2011 phil_nev wrote:
>>Mate, wtf would you know! Have you met Zac? Climbed with him? One of
>the
>>least arrogant, funniest and nicest dudes you could hope meet at the
>crag...
>>Plenty of other talented crankers out there with WAY more ego than him.
>>
>
>Fair call. But people tend to make judgements based on what they see and
>that's what I saw in this clip. Of course my judgement could easily change
>if i met him, or if others say otherwise (as they have), its an opinion
>afterall, not fact.
Making a judgement of a persons character in your own head is fine. Expressing that "opinion" in open is a whole different story. I hope Zac crushes you like a wallnut between his giant shoulders one day.
>>If you ever actually got out of you armchair and onto the rock you might
>>bump into him one day!
>
>Now this is much more an assumption than the one I made.
Am I wrong?
|
26-Sep-2011 3:09:28 PM
|
On 26/09/2011 phil_nev wrote:
>Making a judgement of a persons character in your own head is fine. Expressing
>that "opinion" in open is a whole different story. I hope Zac crushes you
>like a wallnut between his giant shoulders one day.
You are right, I probably should've kept that to myself.
If I were Zac though i'd be more concerned about why that interview came across that way to some viewers given it has gone to an international audience.
>>Now this is much more an assumption than the one I made.
>
>Am I wrong?
Your inclusion of the word "ever" makes you very wrong. But if you were making reference to this year you might be right, then again, come do my course and see how much climbing you fit in ;)
|
26-Sep-2011 3:13:55 PM
|
Wow you do a special course, special education is for special people.
|
26-Sep-2011 4:20:02 PM
|
On 26/09/2011 Sabu wrote:
>If I were Zac i'd be more concerned about why that interview came across
>that way to some viewers given it has gone to an international audience.
You're the only one who's interpreted it that way. I have a theory as to why this is, but I think the mods may define it as personal abuse.
|