On 5/02/2013 Mike Bee wrote:
>Maybe the claimer should have to identify the racking biner
It'd be surprising if a racking biner was left there, unless someone felt the need to bail off a #5 cam. I think we're relying on a description of a distinctive mole on the cam's left buttock at this stage, unless the cam answers to the name Cam or something.
Bonus karma points to the OP for trying to get it back to its original owner, though. |