Goto Chockstone Home

  Guide
  Gallery
  Tech Tips
  Articles
  Reviews
  Dictionary
  Links
  Forum
  Search
  About

      Sponsored By
      ROCK
   HARDWARE

  Shop
Chockstone Photography
Australian Landscape Photography by Michael Boniwell
Australian Landscape Prints





Chockstone Forum - Gear Lust / Lost & Found

Rave About Your Rack Please do not post retail SPAM.

Topic Date User
DEET ate my backpack 4-Jan-2011 At 5:41:06 PM ET
Message
That's a link to a commentary and not a paper... nor was that section referenced... Though the author is affiliated with a reputable group (according to him anyway... a quick search through the University of New Mexico Cancer Center and Department of Internal Medicine's webpage doesn't list him in their personal...) what is written here is just one individual's opinion (as are all the posts in this forum including this one...)

I'm no expert in the field, however I do know that ZnO and TiO particles (the new controversial "nanoparticles" found in some sunscreens) have known effects when inhaled (a possibility if you do dry synthesis, e.g. thermal evaporation, laser ablation, arc discharges, etc) and precautions are usually made not to inhale the products. US OHS guidelines
http://www.osha.gov/SLTC/healthguidelines/zincoxide/recognition.html

As for absorption through the skin... according to the (very) brief summary provided by Therapeutic Goods Administration

The TGA review concluded that:
-The potential for titanium dioxide and zinc oxide nanoparticles in sunscreens to cause adverse effects depends primarily upon the ability of the nanoparticles to reach viable skin cells; and
-To date, the current weight of evidence suggests that titanium dioxide and zinc oxide nanoparticles do not reach viable skin cells; rather, they remain on the surface of the skin and in the outer layer of the skin that is composed of non-viable cells.
http://www.tga.gov.au/npmeds/sunscreen-zotd.htm

However if you read the detailed report on http://www.tga.gov.au/npmeds/sunscreen-zotd.pdf, reference 3 on page 5, reference 6 on page 7 and reference 40 on page 30 (and possibly more that I missed) provide suggest that the particles are absorbed by the skin cells.

At my workplace, the consensus is that there has not been enough studies (or time) in the area to make any conclusions and precautions are made so no skin contact or inhalation is made when producing these particles (better safe than sorry...).

In the end it's a choice of whether you want to get burnt and have an increased chance of getting melanoma, POSSIBLY getting some unknown disease LATER in life (most if not all Australian regulatory bodies have been satisfied with the lack of short term health effects to allow the sale of "nanoparticle" sunscreens) or simply just staying out of the sun (and have Vit D deficiency instead...)

There are 27 replies to this topic.

 

Home | Guide | Gallery | Tech Tips | Articles | Reviews | Dictionary | Forum | Links | About | Search
Chockstone Photography | Landscape Photography Australia | Australian Landscape Photography | Landscape Photos Australia

Please read the full disclaimer before using any information contained on these pages.



Australian Panoramic | Australian Coast | Australian Mountains | Australian Countryside | Australian Waterfalls | Australian Lakes | Australian Cities | Australian Macro | Australian Wildlife
Landscape Photo | Landscape Photography | Landscape Photography Australia | Fine Art Photography | Wilderness Photography | Nature Photo | Australian Landscape Photo | Stock Photography Australia | Landscape Photos | Panoramic Photos | Panoramic Photography Australia | Australian Landscape Photography | High Country Mountain Huts | Mothers Day Gifts | Gifts for Mothers Day | Mothers Day Gift Ideas | Ideas for Mothers Day | Wedding Gift Ideas | Christmas Gift Ideas | Fathers Day Gifts | Gifts for Fathers Day | Fathers Day Gift Ideas | Ideas for Fathers Day | Landscape Prints | Landscape Poster | Limited Edition Prints | Panoramic Photo | Buy Posters | Poster Prints