On 5/07/2009 robertsonja wrote:
>On 5/07/2009 kieranl wrote:
>Your right, the bolt proves that the climb has been drilled into submission.
>Yes, there are stacks of bolts at Arapiles, this is my point; and no,
>just because there are heaps of bolts at Arapiles doesn't make any of them
>justified or justify the placement of more bolts.
>
>Climbs we all care about, OK, how about the piton on Skink, the one on
>the traverse that you can load up with a shop full of cams?
>
>
>
Your post says :
"On 5/07/2009 kieranl wrote:
Your right, the bolt proves that the climb has been drilled into submission."
I did not say that. You have posted your own opinion as though it was a quote from me. I thought you were a troll but gave you the benefit of the doubt. What you have just posted is a lie and leaves me in no doubt. Go away, little man.
Keiran, no offense was meant and apologies if I have misunderstood you meaning. This is not a troll. You mentioned that someone has climbed this route without protection, hence my meaning was that the first ascentionist could of done the same, or walked on past, however they drilled the rock, hence my "drilled into submission" comment. The climbing effort was lowered to suit. |