On 8-Oct-2018 antforknee wrote:
>Just re read the last line of your earlier post "That track isn't closed
>because of it's condition. There are cultural heritage concerns"
>Sorry but could you please clarify... Is the area closed due cultural
>heritage concerns or just the track? If there are cultural heritage issues
>then should this should be update on all the places alf Clark listed?
>Otherwise some people may choose to walk in believing that they are still
>doing all the right things.
The track is closed, not the area. As I understand it the track provided ready access to cultural sites and having it closed provides a buffer space.