On 6/05/2015 ClintR wrote:
>Well this is a pretty frustrating read in my opinion, and yes I'm just
>another non-regular forum user posting my opinion but hell, we're all just
>climbers. This topic is obviously a clash of many different view points
>and opinions and the closure comes down to national parks but there are
>way too many personal motives going on here. Decisions are made and reversed,
>options change, policies are revised. To go out and chop bolts a week after
>this decision seems like a massive over-reaction and one that can only
>be driven by some self interest. The ban is in place. Climbing is not allowed.
>Everyone just leave it be. If you really care about minimising impact,
>let the dust settle. People care about both sides of this argument and
>no doubt there will be future lobbying in both directions. Drastic actions
>like this can only cause further damage and conflict between all parties
>involved. Disappointing to see to say the least.
Disappointing and very sad indeed,
It's a shame Angus couldn't find another outlet to vent his built up rage, Lawn bowls, crochet or even stamp collecting would seem somewhat more appropriate |