On 30/04/2015 Jdodds wrote:
>On 30/04/2015 dalai wrote:
>>
>>Why? Not every cliff needs to be climbed or bolted...
>
>I agree with you there Dalai, but if you Actually knew the area you wouldn't
>be writing this, I have come across at least 20 or more of this style of
>Arches whilst exploring the canyon lands that extend more than 100km north
>of this area, that are naturally protected by the means there is no road
>access and require multiple day walk ins, none of these areas will ever
>be developed due to access and lazy sport climbers. This area in particular
>is less than 100m inside the park boundary, and 150m from the end of a
>fire road. It was the only one suitable for development.
Well shit, if it was only 100m inside the boundary it barely counts as being national park. What the hell did they think was going to happen? It's amazing you guys were so restrained, should have cut a bunch of trees down, made a nice lunch spot, maybe cut a road so you can get your forester down to the crag. Don't these bushwalkers understand that it was the only one suitable for development. Lazy sport climbers have rights. |