On 16/08/2007 M10iswhereitsat. wrote:
>On 7/08/2007 simey wrote:
>>On 7/08/2007 M10iswhereitsat. wrote:
>>>Simey !!! --- I'd love ur opinion here --- U should know !!!
>>
>>What do you want to know that hasn't already been said?
>>
>>26/27 is nonsense. It is soft touch at 25 and could easily be graded
>24.
>
>YEAh, WELL HOW MUCH OF IT IS ' 24 ' ---- A FEW MOVES HERE n THERE ???
>
>
>>Craglets actually graded the second pitch 23 when they first wrote it
>up
>>(although I almost choked when I first read that - obviously someone
>was
>>having a good day when they repeated it).
>
>HMMM , PROLLY BEST CLIMBED IN THE MORNING < BEFORE THE SEA BREEZE HORRIFIES
>THE BARN-DOORS ...
>
>>If you want to train for it, then I recommend throwing a few laps down
>>at Richmond Bridge in Melbourne.
>
>BUT THAT IS TRAVERSING , YEAH ??? HOW WILL THIS HELP ...
>
Awwwwww riiight ... I see what ur on about ,now, Si ...
Yeah fairynuf ... but I gather the orig free is horrible, badly-positioned-desperate-clipping bolts ( hey !! I luv carrots but ... ) , and slimey sea-sprayed nonsense on the south face ... , not 2 mentztion , :P , the rope drag around 3 faces ... NO FUN !!! ...
... the sunny north face , pitch 1 , WHICH U HAVE NOT CLIMBED , looks ... dry n sunny ... but mediocre protection ... NO FUN ...
FARK , ima fun kinda guy !!! :D
so , anyway , as I sed some posts ago, I'll hit the gym an get the pecks pumped , so these issues can be minimised ...
|