On 6/10/2012 IdratherbeclimbingM9 wrote:
>Edward Frillypants.
>He preceeded several others since, by quite a bit timewise, and it is
>one of the things that I have never fully understood about that type of action,
>as once a post is in the public domain, it is virtually there 'forever',
>in that sites like wayback can resurrect information that has been
>'deleted'.
>As far as Chocky goes, I reckon our corporate history is worth preserving,
>and the site is the poorer for such action.
>~> If people are not prepared to 'own' their post / comments then they
>would be better off refraining from posting, instead of potentially corrupting
>threads as orphans down the line, or a series of non-sensical replies to
>posts that have been 'deleted'.
You are so full of yourself M9. There isn't much difference between orphaned threads and your drivel. If people 'own' their posts then they can delete them as they please.
You can use Wayback to resurrect this whenever you need reminding.
Hihihihi to infinity. |