On 11/01/2012 AndyJS wrote:
>is it better to get a policy
>that explicitly rules in dangerous activities and then to stick to their
>terms, or would it be safer to go for a policy that doesn't explicitly
>rule OUT climbing and hope that they don't try to get you on a fine print
>technicality?
I'd say the former, as they always have ambigous catch-all statements they can use to rule out your activity.
e.g. "This policy excludes knitting, surfing, eating sandwiches and any activity of an active nature" |