| Author |
| Retrobolted anchors - Witch and Wishful Thinking |
|
|
13-Dec-2018 1:54:50 PM
|
On 13-Dec-2018 JDB wrote:
>To DD, TH & EW - it is hard to quantify your collective wisdom.
Thanks! Hopefully the bolts are gone and patched which would require a shifter and 5 minutes and no Chocky. Until then , banter is fine.
|
14-Dec-2018 1:15:16 PM
|
On 14-Dec-2018 One Day Hero wrote:
>On 12-Dec-2018 tufa_humpa wrote:
>>Hey ODH, fancy heading south? Do you still have any of those DCV t-shirts?
>>We're just downhill. Happy to help and get E. Wells' hardware back to
>>her.
>
>Sorry mate, too far out of the way for 4 bolts. I'll be there in spirit
>though. Yeah, we really need to do another print run of shirts. I'll get
>our merch guy onto it :)
Chuck it on redbubble. Print to order.
|
14-Dec-2018 6:29:50 PM
|
On 10-Dec-2018 dalai wrote:
>On 10-Dec-2018 Chloe wrote:
>
>>why the setup is dumb if it has redundancy.
>
>Issue other than being totally unnecessary (so many easy to find natural
>anchors used by everyone the last 55 years prior to the retrobolt!) is
>that anchors on the face below the top shouldn't be regular hangers.
>
>An anchor unless easily reached from the top as questioned by Rodw should
>be able to have the rope threaded, as top anchors placed below the lip
>are usually intended to be used as loweroffs. This would be dangerous to
>do with these hangers.
Thank you (and rodw), for the feedback.
|
15-Dec-2018 3:27:54 PM
|
Not retrobolted onto the runout/crux pitch I hope ....
|
18-Dec-2018 4:57:32 AM
|
On 14-Dec-2018 ajfclark wrote:
>Chuck it on redbubble. Print to order.
I think we both know Spreadshirt make the best custom shirts.
|
8-Jan-2019 7:18:49 PM
|
The bolts above Witch have now got captive rings fitted to them, I don’t know if they have been fitted above Wishful Thinking, I’ll check it out Thursday evening.
I intend on removing these and hope that the offender stops installing unwarranted hardware
|
8-Jan-2019 9:00:09 PM
|
I thought these bolts above witch/wishful thinking were removed just recently. Have they been reinstalled again?
|
9-Jan-2019 4:07:16 AM
|
The bolts were left in, which made for easy re-equipping
|
9-Jan-2019 9:47:23 AM
|
On 12-Dec-2018 Duang Daunk wrote:
>>On 12-Dec-2018 Bro JDB wrote:
>>I think this scenario should be a red flag for all climbers; as there
>>is a huge influx of new climbers eminating from the burgeoning indoor gym
>>industry, who are heading outdoors without a good understanding of the
>>'ground rules'. So how are this next generation of sport climbers going
>>to be educated?
>
>They already are educated.
>“Like, that gym blue route was reset tha otha day; man it’s nails now!”
>Leads to...
>“Going to Camels Lump to practice getting stronger outdoors, but that
>Boogie Route is a bit gnarled and could do with a reset!!”
Sorry bro JDB.
I was wrong.
With the latest information available it appears the perpetrator has been educated by Chockstone! They obviously read Dalai reply to Chloe and went back to safetyise their botched lower off job.
Next thing they’ll want their hangers back to safetyise some other route...
|
9-Jan-2019 11:15:30 AM
|
On 9-Jan-2019 Duang Daunk wrote:
>With the latest information available it appears the perpetrator has been
>educated by Chockstone! They obviously read Dalai reply to Chloe and went
>back to safetyise their botched lower off job.
>Next thing they’ll want their hangers back to safetyise some other route...
From thecrag discussion, it appears to loweroff hangers were placed by the person who discovered these bolts and removed the original hangers and not by the original perpetrator.
|
9-Jan-2019 11:27:04 AM
|
On 9-Jan-2019 dalai wrote:
>From thecrag discussion, it appears to loweroff hangers were placed by
>the person who discovered these bolts and removed the original hangers
>and not by the original perpetrator.
This effectively sanctions the retrobolt.
Death by a thousand cuts happening here bro...
|
10-Jan-2019 7:10:19 AM
|
On 9-Jan-2019 Duang Daunk wrote:
>On 9-Jan-2019 dalai wrote:
>>From thecrag discussion, it appears to loweroff hangers were placed by
>>the person who discovered these bolts and removed the original hangers
>>and not by the original perpetrator.
>
>This effectively sanctions the retrobolt.
>Death by a thousand cuts happening here bro...
Or is it progress?
|
10-Jan-2019 7:47:56 AM
|
Thankfully looks like someone will be chopping these Saturday.
|
10-Jan-2019 6:01:50 PM
|
I’ll all for retrobolting the retrobolter.
|
11-Jan-2019 6:07:58 PM
|
On 10-Jan-2019 gordoste wrote:
>On 9-Jan-2019 Duang Daunk wrote:
>>This effectively sanctions the retrobolt.
>>Death by a thousand cuts happening here bro...
>
>Or is it progress?
Death to retroers by a thousand cuts would be progress.
On 10-Jan-2019 phillipivan wrote:
>I’ll all for retrobolting the retrobolter.
Crucifixion?
This sounds even better than death by a thousand cuts!
... and for any do-gooder pussy politically correct out there, learn to recognise sarcasm in posts before you get on any high horses.
|
13-Jan-2019 8:45:18 AM
|
Inappropriate bolts were chopped and studs knocked back to flush/recessed yesterday.
|
13-Jan-2019 7:03:18 PM
|
On 13-Jan-2019 anthonycuskelly wrote:
>Inappropriate bolts were chopped and studs knocked back to flush/recessed
>yesterday.
Excellent work. Thank you to the debolter-er;)
|