Chockstone Forum

      Sponsored By
      ROCK
   HARDWARE

Chockstone Photography

Australian Landscape Prints

Chockstone Forum - Chockstone Feedback

Provide Feedback About This Website

Topic Date User

FYI Chockstoners - this weeks deletions, etc. 5-Jul-2017 At 9:59:44 AM Chockstone Moderator

Message

On 3/07/2017 Chockstone Moderator edit-wrote:
>[Moderator edit: This one brings us to 559 of 7957 members… & counting...
>
>After your initiative, I found this site;

https://www.stopforumspam.com/

>... on which their search function could prove useful for us too.]

Historical registration User ID amit87 disabled after using the above site to research previous spam history of the email address involved.

[This is likely to be the first of a growing number of pre-emptive retro-disablements from our historical registrations; so I will restrict my updates of same to ongoing edits of this post...]

Historical registration User ID scottpapers1 disabled (again??) after using the above site to research previous spam history of the email address involved.

Historical registration User ID mattwalsh disabled after using the above site to research previous spam history of the email address involved.

Historical registration User ID jokergreen0220 disabled after using the above site to research previous spam history of the email address involved.

Historical registration User ID vishall disabled after using the above site to research previous spam history of the email address involved.

Historical registration User ID LindaJohn541 disabled after using the above site to research previous spam history of the email address involved.

Historical registration User ID RobertChappell disabled after using the above site to research previous spam history of the email address involved.

Historical registration User ID aaronkoblin1 disabled after using the above site to research previous spam history of the email address involved.

Historical registration User ID jhayye disabled after using the above site to research previous spam history of the email address involved.

Historical registration User ID ngo1 disabled after using the above site to research previous spam history of the email address involved.

Historical registration User ID vishal78 disabled after using the above site to research previous spam history of the email address involved.

Historical registration User ID jonathantoussaint disabled after using the above site to research previous spam history of the email address involved.

Historical registration User ID kumarets disabled after using the above site to research previous spam history of the email address involved.

Historical registration User ID christopherfastern disabled after using the above site to research previous spam history of the email address involved.

Historical registration User ID vear disabled after using the above site to research previous spam history of the email address involved.

Historical registration User ID skem01 disabled after using the above site to research previous spam history of the email address involved.

Historical registration User ID david_abisha disabled after using the above site to research previous spam history of the email address involved (presently clear), though comments in profile indicate a probable investment or medical spammer, and I have no tolerance for anything that's even half-spurious. You can email us to review it again, if you think you are hard done by.

Historical registration User ID pattayaproperty disabled after using the above site to research previous spam history of the email address involved (presently clear), though comments in profile indicate a probable real estate spammer, and I have no tolerance for anything that's even half-spurious. You can email us to review it again, if you think you are hard done by.

Historical registration User ID Nestor disabled after using the above site to research previous spam history of the email address involved (presently clear), though comments in profile indicate a probable film or entertainment spammer, and I have no tolerance for anything that's even half-spurious. You can email us to review it again, if you think you are hard done by.

Historical registration User ID WilsonIZF disabled after using the above site to research previous spam history of the email address involved (presently clear), though researching of comments in profile indicate a probable recruitment service spambot, and I have no tolerance for anything that's even half-spurious. You can email us to review it again, if you think you are hard done by.

Historical registration User ID Royce disabled after using the above site to research previous spam history of the email address involved (presently clear), though researching of comments in profile indicate a probable lifestyle/retail/pharmaceutical/financial? spammer, and I have no tolerance for anything that's even half-spurious. You can email us to review it again, if you think you are hard done by.

Historical registration User ID AngelaOrt disabled after using the above site to research previous spam history of the email address involved (presently clear), though researching of comments in profile indicate a probable retail (identity theft?) spammer, and I have no tolerance for anything that's even half-spurious. You can email us to review it again, if you think you are hard done by.

Historical registration User ID Poppy47N disabled after using the above site to research previous spam history of the email address involved (presently clear), though researching of comments in profile indicate a probable clothing spammer, and I have no tolerance for anything that's even half-spurious. You can email us to review it again, if you think you are hard done by.

Historical registration User ID AlenaPedig disabled after using the above site to research previous spam history of the email address involved (presently clear), though researching of comments in profile indicate a probable retail spammer, and I have no tolerance for anything that's even half-spurious. You can email us to review it again, if you think you are hard done by.

Historical registration User ID filmneverdie disabled after using the above site to research previous spam history of the email address involved (presently clear), though researching of comments in profile indicate a probable retail (cameras and film) spammer, and I have no tolerance for anything that's even half-spurious. You can email us to review it again, if you think you are hard done by.

Historical registration User ID WomenCostume disabled after using the above site to research previous spam history of the email address involved (presently clear), though researching of registration indicates a probable retail spammer, and I have no tolerance for anything that's even half-spurious. You can email us to review it again, if you think you are hard done by.

Historical registration User ID (x space reserved for the next one x) disabled after using the above site to research previous spam history of the email address involved (presently clear), though researching of comments in profile indicate a probable retail spammer, and I have no tolerance for anything that's even half-spurious. You can email us to review it again, if you think you are hard done by.

.

My reminder-marker: Have reviewed up to and inclusive of Page 103 of 399 pages of registrations... ie all registrations back to 17/12/2012.

[The first 40 pages reviewed netted 18 spammers, the following 30 pages only netted 4, and the next 33 pages netted 4 more...
The further back in time the more diminishing the return for effort appears to be, though I noticed many of our confirmed spammers that we had already disabled within the earlier time-frame, were coming up as blanks when researched anew. My conclusion is that historical spammers have not yet been registered with the new database tool at our disposal, unless they are still actively using an old email address...]

NOTE: Serious question marks hang over the following ID's, that warrant further investigation; ... possible 'sleepers' adopting the tactic of embedding themselves to later emerge and spam us?

nikefd which joined 07/11/2016. [This user seems more interested in coding issues than climbing? If so, why did it join Chockstone? Reference (of several similar) https://github.com/facebookresearch/fairseq/issues/77 Its history being too suspicious I have now pre-emptively disabled it as I have no tolerance for anything that's even half-spurious. You can email us to review it again, if you think you are hard done by.]

adams607 which joined 21/10/2015. [Another user similar to nikefd ... Reference https://forums.virtualbox.org/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=40392 Also may be an eye-wear merchant. Its history being too suspicious I have now pre-emptively disabled it as I have no tolerance for anything that's even half-spurious. You can email us to review it again, if you think you are hard done by. ]

easonqin2002 which joined 10/09/2015. [Further investigation reveals this user is probably a chinese tripod (cameras) retailer, so has now been pre-emptively disabled].

jhytdku60 which joined 09/09/2015.
[Further investigation reveals nothing extra at this stage, so the registration remains enabled.]

ihsnksnt which joined 03/07/2015.
sunil, (maybe not?), which joined 23/05/2015.
xa2no which joined 04/03/2015.
Kostyan which joined 26/02/2015.
BetseyKlimas which joined 17/02/2015.
LorrainFort which joined 15/02/2015.
gordiehowe11 which joined 25/11/2014.
550paracord which joined 07/10/2014.
poudelbirsha08 which joined 19/09/2014.
mjghjg which joined 08/08/2014.
post123 which joined 21/06/2014.
gds which joined 11/04/2014.
pleasantqx which joined 02/01/2014.
sigmatest which joined 19/12/2013.
re5 which joined 26/07/2013.

It would appear that spammer registrations prior to 2015 are far fewer in frequency than from that date onward.