Author |
|
4-Sep-2013 7:21:04 AM
|
Is it time to change chockstone from:
"Climbing in Victoria, Australia" to "Climbing in Australia"
|
4-Sep-2013 9:41:57 AM
|
Nah.
|
4-Sep-2013 12:32:52 PM
|
Yes but it's been raised before:
http://203.16.224.101/Forum/Forum.asp
|
4-Sep-2013 12:45:00 PM
|
Sorry....i posted this in 2005 under "Chockstone to go national?".....have no idea how to link to thread.
|
4-Sep-2013 1:27:27 PM
|
On 4/09/2013 maxdacat wrote:
>Sorry....i posted this in 2005 under "Chockstone to go national?".....have
>no idea how to link to thread.
http://www.chockstone.org/Forum/Forum.asp?Action=DisplayTopic&ForumID=1&MessageID=23110&Replies=25
There you go.
As a Sydney climber who has been using this forum for years, I'd ask - what would you change (other than the reference to "Victorian climbers") to make it a national climbers website? Isn't it already the defacto climbers forum for Aus? Sure, the banana-benders have their own local site and it works well for them, and there are a bunch of other semi-defunct local sites, but Chocky already seems to be the national default.
Having a look at the thread above, I was amused by the comments about rc.com, given its subsequent demise into irrelevance - for f's sake lets not use that as a model...
|
4-Sep-2013 1:33:24 PM
|
On 4/09/2013 technogeekery wrote:
> I'd ask -
>what would you change (other than the reference to "Victorian climbers")
>to make it a national climbers website?
We would all have to type slower to accommodate all the Kweeeenzlairndas
|