Author |
James Kassay just sent Sleepy Rave, V15. |
|
|
9-Nov-2009 4:57:50 PM
|
On 9/11/2009 Duncan wrote:
>FFS, have you people not heard of sarcasm? It's not exactly subtle. Here,
>let me explain: HE'S TAKING THE PISS.
He's a seppo and we all know how well seppos understand sarcasm (hint: they don't).
|
9-Nov-2009 8:50:44 PM
|
Takes a smack in the head for them to get it. ;-P
|
10-Nov-2009 9:49:22 AM
|
Nice work James.
|
10-Nov-2009 11:03:55 AM
|
On 6/11/2009 Sabu wrote:
>I have to say though, did anyone else snigger at the fact that he was
>shirtless when the
>other guy was in a down jacket? :P
It is a well known fact that male climbers climb significantly better when:
1) they are shirtless
2) there are females around
3) they are in competition with other male climbers
|
10-Nov-2009 11:19:26 AM
|
>It is a well known fact that male climbers climb significantly better
>when:
>1) they are shirtless
>2) there are females around
>3) they are in competition with other male climbers
You forgot
4) when they are being filmed/photographed
|
10-Nov-2009 11:27:15 AM
|
On 10/11/2009 JimboV10 wrote:
>>It is a well known fact that male climbers climb significantly better
>>when:
>>1) they are shirtless
>>2) there are females around
>>3) they are in competition with other male climbers
>
>You forgot
>4) when they are being filmed/photographed
I should add that there has never been any recorded cases of 1 being false while 2 being true. According to anacdotal(i spel gud) evidence, however, it can happen on a rare occasion.
|
10-Nov-2009 11:40:24 AM
|
On 10/11/2009 Olbert wrote:
>I should add that there has never been any recorded cases of 1 being false
>while 2 being true.
Assuming (5) the male climber is under the age of 30. Although if the male climber is over the age of 30 chances are (6) no self respecting female is within miles anyway...
|
10-Nov-2009 12:17:27 PM
|
Yeah, thanks for that.
|