Chockstone Forum

      Sponsored By
      ROCK
   HARDWARE

Chockstone Photography

Australian Landscape Prints

Chockstone Forum - General Discussion

General Climbing Discussion

Author

Official Flame Neil Thread


Sabu

4-Sep-2009
8:47:40 PM

On 4/09/2009 kieranl wrote:
>Josh, just to give fair warning, Norm Booth and Ray Lassman are going
>to be unleashed on Kalymnos at the same time. It'll be just like being
>on the crags in Aus.
Why the warning? There'll be plenty of warning as you'll be able to hear Norm from the other
side of the island!!!


Zebedee

5-Sep-2009
12:07:45 AM

On 4/09/2009 Wendy wrote:
>Sorry ODH, speed climbing's not my thing, and dares are not really my
>form of conflict resolution, not to mention that I'm one of the trio of
>natimuk cripples at the moment. Actually, I think we are more than a trio
>... and how did I end up getting labelled a bossy, elitist, crag owner
>anyway?
Crippled are youse? How did you get labled bossy and elitist etc. It's your tailored suits and fashionable handbags combined with your high powered position within a powerful large private corporation. Either that or I'm pΐssed you decide.

Wendy

5-Sep-2009
8:45:10 AM

On 5/09/2009 Zebedee wrote:
>On 4/09/2009 Wendy wrote:
>>Sorry ODH, speed climbing's not my thing, and dares are not really my
>>form of conflict resolution, not to mention that I'm one of the trio
>of
>>natimuk cripples at the moment. Actually, I think we are more than a
>trio
>>... and how did I end up getting labelled a bossy, elitist, crag owner
>>anyway?
>Crippled are youse? How did you get labled bossy and elitist etc. It's
>your tailored suits and fashionable handbags combined with your high powered
>position within a powerful large private corporation. Either that or I'm
>pΐssed you decide.

I thought it might have been that 6 figure salary I pull out here ...


pmonks

5-Sep-2009
9:22:51 AM

Josh - if you or the crew bump into Ray in Kalymnos can you warn him that I haven't forgetten that he has my Tuolumne guidebook, and that he'd better have a plan to get it back to me! ;-)


muki

5-Sep-2009
11:14:40 AM

On 30/08/2009 Sabu wrote:
>If you don't like Neil i suggest the ignore function, or maybe just post/do
>something that he
>can find reason to ban you for....

what a petty & juvenile thing to do, ban someone who has a different opinion to your own.
Or god forbid....
Has a low opinion of you, but nm has done this before, in the blue Mts accident thread, nm banned me
from this site, because I repeated what he had said, and advised that a person infact needed to
contact nm in person to find out more!, this ban didn't last long, as nm is just a lower level mod.

but Safer Cliffs Australia is all yours isn't it nm, well pathetic losers take the bat and ball home when
the
game doesn't go the way they want it to... didn't the flame nm thread go the way you wanted it to, with
everybody rushing to defend you from the nasty man who has a different opinion.

Well now SCA is your own little artificial construct again.
Where you can just have the people that agree with your opinion, and don't have any independent
ideas or view points that might rub you the wrong way......

Although some would call it a dictatorship, and what you have done as censorship
But I'll concede defeat, you can't win against a dictatorship that censors what ever you say.
But remember that actions speak louder than words, and what you've just done (twice now)
is a permanent record of your own failings to deal with the situation like man, and stand up for
yourself, but rather, just change the rules, and ban anyone with a different opinion than your own.

they should rename this site "monty's world"............. I'm over it! I don't care any more.
and this whole post will probably end up being deleted any way !!!


masterofrup

6-Sep-2009
10:36:54 AM

On 3/09/2009 One Day Hero wrote:
>On 2/09/2009 masterofrup wrote:
>>I'm not sure what this means or where to put it but i have done some
>research.
>>Chockstone is full of opinions, searching the frequency of these via
>common
>>forum abrv, imo and imho I perhaps not surprisingly discovered that there
>>are 2068 posts on chockstone containing opinions and only 338 containing
>>humble opinions. A quick sample of the users who have posted these opinions
>>reveals that this thread's protaganist has many opinions but also quite
>>a few humble ones. Interestingly he is not as prolific in either of
>these
>>categories as M9 he he he. Finally and also interestingly, the most
>recent
>>owner of an opinion, BomberPro has contributed quite a few in his time
>>on this forum, but to date only one of them has been offered humbly.
>>hope this adds something to the discussion.
>>
>>the full research project can be found online at www.espeak_thesis.therupinstitute.edu.a
>
>
>What a pile of wank! Every post expresses an opinion, the fact that it
>is an opinion can be assumed. Proceeding ones opinion with IMO is only
>relevant in that it identifies people who think that sometimes their opinions
>are something other than opinions. Proceeding one's opinion with the word
>humble does not make the opinion humble, humble people probably don't post
>at all!
>
>Research? Christ! banging chockstone through a wordsearch is a five minute
>exercise in proving nothing....I really hate the f---ing social "sciences"

Dear one day hero
thank you for your response to my post. my first reaction upon reading your reply was to be offended but on further reflection i think you might be on to something. use of the word research for my admittedly easy word search was probably "stretching it" a bit. consider your thoughts taken on notice, and the next time that foul temptress whimsy comes knocking at my bedroom window i shall undertake to firmly draw the curtains.

yours sincerely

ray

kieranl

6-Sep-2009
11:47:45 AM

Ray,
You should give One Day Zero's comments the weight they deserve, if you can find any.


evanbb

6-Sep-2009
5:16:42 PM

On 5/09/2009 bomber pro wrote:
>they should rename this site "monty's world"............. I'm over it!

Wow, this is good invective BP, even from you. How's the shoulder coming along? Chip healing nicely?


Phil Box

6-Sep-2009
6:08:54 PM

On 6/09/2009 evanbb wrote:
>On 5/09/2009 bomber pro wrote:
>>they should rename this site "monty's world"............. I'm over it!
>
>Wow, this is good invective BP, even from you. How's the shoulder coming
>along? Chip healing nicely?

Hey keep it on topic, this is the official flame neil thread, not the be nice to bomber pro thread.


wallwombat

6-Sep-2009
6:22:41 PM

On 6/09/2009 Phil Box wrote:

>Hey keep it on topic, this is the official flame neil thread, not the
>be nice to bomber pro thread.

I don't care what it's called . I know it's bloody funny.


Phil Box

7-Sep-2009
8:01:16 AM

On 6/09/2009 wallwombat wrote:
>On 6/09/2009 Phil Box wrote:
>
>>Hey keep it on topic, this is the official flame neil thread, not the
>>be nice to bomber pro thread.
>
>I don't care what it's called . I know it's bloody funny.

Iz troo, very funny. I reckon Neil is rolling around on the floor laughing his head off at some of the comments. I wish Crux was still going, lotsa material in here for at least a couple of issues.

jono_1

7-Sep-2009
10:37:26 AM

i think this should be changed to flame anyone you want thread!


Eduardo Slabofvic

7-Sep-2009
10:43:50 AM

On 7/09/2009 jono_1 wrote:
>i think this should be changed to flame anyone you want thread!

I agree.

I really hate that guy Hannibal. He recons he did a new route up in the Alps, but he just sat there and let the elephant do all the work. What a light weight.

One Day Hero

7-Sep-2009
1:07:06 PM

On 4/09/2009 Wendy wrote:
>Sorry ODH, speed climbing's not my thing, and dares are not really my
>form of conflict resolution, not to mention that I'm one of the trio of
>natimuk cripples at the moment. Actually, I think we are more than a trio
>... and how did I end up getting labelled a bossy, elitist, crag owner
>anyway?

I was thinking of it more as conflict dissolution and way to transition from bitching on chocky to climbing and drinking beer.......and I reckon it would be stacks of fun. Didn't mean to chuck you in with Kieran in the crag owner box, just thought you might be up for it.......why is everyone in Nati getting injured? Are you all subbing in on Simey's footy team?

Wendy

7-Sep-2009
1:37:17 PM

On 7/09/2009 One Day Hero wrote:
>On 4/09/2009 Wendy wrote:
>>Sorry ODH, speed climbing's not my thing, and dares are not really my
>>form of conflict resolution, not to mention that I'm one of the trio
>of
>>natimuk cripples at the moment. Actually, I think we are more than a
>trio
>>... and how did I end up getting labelled a bossy, elitist, crag owner
>>anyway?
>
>I was thinking of it more as conflict dissolution and way to transition
>from bitching on chocky to climbing and drinking beer.......and I reckon
>it would be stacks of fun. Didn't mean to chuck you in with Kieran in the
>crag owner box, just thought you might be up for it.......why is everyone
>in Nati getting injured? Are you all subbing in on Simey's footy team?

mmm, climbing and beer ... that's the way forward ... Well, Simey's is a footy injury and the not quite the whole town is laid up, but Steve and I were joking the other day how the kids had a bunch of cripples taking them out climbing - bung legs, bung shoulders, arthritis. At least the bung leg and shoulder should get better soonly.

One Day Hero

7-Sep-2009
6:08:03 PM

On 6/09/2009 masterofrup wrote:
>Dear one day hero
>thank you for your response to my post. my first reaction upon reading
>your reply was to be offended but on further reflection i think you might
>be on to something. use of the word research for my admittedly easy word
>search was probably "stretching it" a bit. consider your thoughts taken
>on notice, and the next time that foul temptress whimsy comes knocking
>at my bedroom window i shall undertake to firmly draw the curtains.
>
>yours sincerely
>
>ray

;)

What are my chances of getting cited in future rupinstitute papers? Perhaps a collaboration?

One Day Hero

7-Sep-2009
6:19:26 PM

On 5/09/2009 bomber pro wrote:
>Well now SCA is your own little artificial construct again.
>Where you can just have the people that agree with your opinion, and don't
>have any independent
>ideas or view points that might rub you the wrong way......
>
Don't worry Bomber, I'm reliably informed (by someone graced with access to the SCV sanctuary) that it is shitboring anyway. Removing dissenting voices from chatrooms is like removing the rooting from a bongo flick.........the "plot" continues but without the "action sequences" as distraction.........it's apparent just how little goes on!


wallwombat

8-Sep-2009
1:13:29 PM

Bump.

Wendy

8-Sep-2009
1:30:34 PM

Are you bored Womby?


wallwombat

8-Sep-2009
1:47:27 PM

On 8/09/2009 Wendy wrote:
>Are you bored Womby?

Very

Also, I didn't want to see the Flame Neil thread slip off the front page. It's too valuable.

There are 121 messages in this topic.