Just bringing the debate back to the topic after being hijacked by the postmodern sophistry of anthropogenic climate change scepticism.
As someone who assesses coal mining proposals for a living, I find the idea that a project could be refused on 'visual impact' grounds hilarious.
Visual Impacts are considered a second or third order issue after greenhouse, biodiversity/ecological, air quality, noise, water, road traffic and about 10 other things.
Anyone who is precious enough to piss and moan about the visual impacts of wind turbines need to get some serious perspective. |